U.v.Anusha v. a.Shajahan IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Two contempt petitions challenging directions in earlier writ judgments came up for admission. Counsel submitted compliance. The Court found no grievance and closed the cases.
What the court decided
CON.CASE(C)S.355 & 410 OF 2021 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 31ST BHADRA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 355 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.09.2019 IN WP(C) 18810/2016 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITINOER:
U.V.ANUSHA, AGED 33 YEARS, W/O.PRADEEP, LABORATORY ASSISTANT, VRAMMHS SCHOOL, BRAHMAKULAM, THAIKKAD SOUTH, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. LINDONS C.DAVIS SMT.E.U.DHANYA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
U.V.Anusha
- respondent
S.A.Shajahan
- respondent
Jeevan Babu K.
- respondent
Sakunthala K.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court