S.S.Satheesachandran v. P.Venugopal
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt of court case was listed on Tuesday, though the judgment header incorrectly states Wednesday. The respondent argued the earlier judgment was complied with. The court closed the case based on this submission without recording reasons or disposing of the matter formally.
What did the court decide?
None; the case was closed based on the respondent's submission.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021/21ST MAGHA,1942 Con.Case(C).No.147 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 7250/2020
JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7250/2020(E) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O. P.N.SANKARANARAYANA PILLA, RESIDING AT SWATHI, HOUSE NO.32/2278, ORIENT PARK, VADUTHALA, KOCHI-682 023.
BY ADVS. SRI.SHYAM PADMAN SRI.C.M.ANDREWS SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR KUM.LAYA MARY JOSEPH SMT.IRENE ABRAHAM SRI.HARISH ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT:
P.VENUGOPAL (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SYAMJI RAM
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.S. Satheesachandan
- respondent
P.Venugopal, Secretary Consumer Affairs
Coram
N. Nagaresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court