Sajeev R v. Dr. Fathahudheen, Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1053 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7373/2021 DATED 25.03.2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/2ND PETITIONER:
SAJEEV R, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O. RAVINDRAN, PUTHUVAL PUTHEN VEEDU, MANIKKAMVILAKAM, POONTHURA P.O, MUTTATHARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):
DR. FATHAHUDHEEN, CHAIRMAN, THE DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORIZATION COMMITTEE FOR TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 683104 (AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER OF THE RESPONDENT IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. B.S.SYAMANTHAK
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC No.1053/2021
: 2 :
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Dated this the 4th day of August, 2021
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent has passed an order pursuant
to the directions of this Court and therefore this contempt case need not be prosecuted.
Accordingly, recording the above submission, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH, JUDGE
aks/04.08.2021
COC No.1053/2021
: 3 :
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1053/2021
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE:
ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P(C) NO. 7373/2021 DATED 25-03-2021
SR
Sajeev R
Dr. Fathahudheen
N. Nagares
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court