Viju v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismisses as the petitioner's counsel submitted that it is not pressed. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the application.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 11TH BHADRA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 4540 OF 2021
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
VIJU AGED 47 YEARS SON OF SEBASTIAN, KALLARACKAL VEEDU, GOTHURUTHU THEKKE KADAVU, CHENDAMANGALAM VILLAGE ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683512
BY ADVS. SAM ISAAC POTHIYIL TINU JOHNSON VISHNU DAS SRUTHI DAS JISHMA K.S OSHIN MENDEZ PHILIP ARUN M.N. MOHAMED AMJAD K.M
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICE KODUNGALLOOR POLICE STATION, KODUNGALLOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT THRISSUR, PIN - 680669
SRI.NOUSHAD K.A-SR.PP
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VIJU
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
SHIRCY V.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court