Bail application filed by an accused was admitted. The applicant counsel sought and was granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 10TH BHADRA, 1943
BAIL APPL. NO. 5432 OF 2021
O.R.NO.1/2021 OF Nelliampathy Forest Range Office, Palakkad
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMP 1274/2021 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD
APPLICANT/ACCUSED NO.2 :-
RASSAL AGED 47 YEARS S/O.POCKER, KALLANKKUNNAM, CHOKKODE VILLAGE, NILAMBUR TALK, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT :-
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM- 682 031.
SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BAIL APPL. NO. 5432 OF 2021
2
ORDER
Application for regular bail.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this application. Permission is granted as sought for by the petitioner.
Hence, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
SHIRCY V. JUDGE
SMA
Rassal
State of Kerala
SHIRCY V.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
