Asha v. Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner alleged refusal to accept basic tax. The court held that property attachment is not a reason to refuse basic tax, which shall be accepted subject to creditors' rights.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was disposed of holding that basic tax shall be accepted subject to the right of any creditor or third party.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 16TH MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.295 OF 2020(J)
PETITIONER:
ASHA AGED 50 YEARS, W/O. PRASAD, 11/602 B(2/85), NANDANAM HOUSE, U.C.COLLEGE P.O., KADUNGALLOOR, ALUVA-683 102
BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, NORTH PARUR, PIN: 683513.
2 VILLAGE OFFICER, KADUNGALLUR VILLAGE, NORTH PARUR PIN: 683508
SRI. S. GOPINATHAN – SR. G.P
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether attachment over property can be a reason to refuse the petitioner basic tax.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ASHA AGED 50 YEARS, W/O. PRASAD
- respondent
TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, NORTH PARUR
- respondent
VILLAGE OFFICER, KADUNGALLUR VILLAGE, NORTH PARUR
- respondent
SRI. S. GOPINATHAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court