Disposed

T.v.Janardhanan v. the Assistant Executive Engineer

Kerala HC18 Dec 2020WP(C)/28416/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition was disposed of by the High Court of Kerala. The court directed the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation regarding claim for payment of various amounts under different heads within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation within three months.

T.v.Janardhanan Vs the Assistant Executive… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Kerala HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C).No.28416 OF 2020(B)

¶5

PETITIONER:

¶6

T.V.JANARDHANAN, AGED 74 YEARS SON OF CC REVAMMA, RESIDING AT THANCHANKATTIL HOUSE, PURAYAR DESOM PO, CHENGAMANAD, UNION CHRISTIAN COLLEGE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM-683101, PROPRIETOR OF TV ELECTRICALS, PURAYAR, DESAM PO, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶7

BY ADVS. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. SMT.K.S.SMITHA SMT.T.T.SHANIBA SRI.M.V.VIPINDAS SHRI.AMAL DEV D SMT.AKHILA P.

¶8

RESPONDENTS:

¶9

1 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL WING (IRRIGATION) SUB DIVISION, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683101.

¶10

2 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, CIVIL STATION, 3RD FLOOR, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682030.

¶11

3 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

¶12

OTHER PRESENT:

¶13

GP, SMT. VINITHA.B,

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C).No.28416 OF 2020(B)

¶16

¶17

J U D G M E N T

¶18

Petitioner claims to be an approved Contractor,

¶19

who was undertaken various works under the respondents claiming payment of various amounts under various heads. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation.

¶20

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

¶21

that petitioner would be satisfied with a direction to the first respondent to consider the same.

¶22

Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation, within a period of 'three months' from the date of receipt of a copy of

¶23

the judgment.

¶24

Sd/- P.V.ASHA, JUDGE

¶25

¶26

WP(C).No.28416 OF 2020(B)

¶27

¶28

APPENDIX

¶29

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶30

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILS OF THE TENDERS GRANTED TO THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH THE NATURE OF THE WORK AND CONTRACT DETAILS.

¶31

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.

¶32

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE DISPATCH OF EXHIBIT P2 REPRESENTATION.

T.v.Janardhanan v. the Assistant Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.v.Janardhanan v. the Assistant Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.v.Baby Vs Angamaly Municipality

Megha.D.R. Vs Union of India

Hydro Electrical System Vs Kerala Water Authority

Muhsina a. Vs the State of Kerala

Nirmala Rajappan, Vs the State of Kerala

Goodwil Power Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Kerala