Dismissed

C.Bhaskaran v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC16 Dec 2020WP(C)/28164/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a life member of Kerala State Council for Child Welfare, sought a direction to include vigilance case files before the committee considered service benefits for the 4th respondent. Court held directions for lawful consideration were unnecessary and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner failed to secure a direction to the executive committee; Writ Petition dismissed.

C.Bhaskaran Vs State of Kerala — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2020)

¶1

W.P(c).No.28164/2020-U 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942

¶6

WP(C).No.28164 OF 2020

¶7

PETITIONER:

¶8

C.BHASKARAN AGED 50 YEARS S/O CHANDRAN, ASARIVILAKATH VEEDU, THALIYIL KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 002.

¶9

BY ADV. SHRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR

¶10

RESPONDENTS:

¶11

1 STATE OF KERALA REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 1.

¶12

2 KERALA STATE COUNCIL FOR CHILD WELFARE, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-695 014.

¶13

3 CHAIRMAN, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, KERALA STATE CHILD WELFARE, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶14

4 P. SASIDHARAN NAIR, AGED 46 YEARS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE COUNCIL FOR CHILD WELFARE, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, (UNDER SUSPENSION) RESIDING AT LALITHA VILASOM TC 49/100 MUDAVANMUGAL, POOJAPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶15

STATE ATTORNEY,SRI.K.V.SOHAN, SR. STANDING COUNSEL SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

W.P(c).No.28164/2020-U

¶18

¶19

P.V.ASHA, J.

¶20

----------------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.28164 of 2020-U

¶21

Dated this the 16^th day of December, 2020

¶22

J U D G M E N T

¶23

The petitioner claims to be a life member of Kerala State Council for Child

¶24

Welfare and that he is a social worker. He apprehends that the executive committee, which is directed by Ext.P1 judgment to take a decision in respect of the claim of the 4^th respondent for certain service benefits, would consider his request without reference to vigilance cases/proceedings and seeks a direction to the 2^nd respondent to place Ext.P3 and connected files for appreciation of executive committee while considering the 4^th respondent's representation.

¶25

The request of the petitioner to be considered is with respect to the claim of the 4^th respondent for certain service benefits. When there is a direction from this Court to consider the claim of the 4^th respondent for his service benefits, it is upto the executive committee to consider the same in accordance with law.

¶26

I am of the view that it is not necessary for this Court to issue any further direction on it, that too, at the instance of the petitioner.

¶27

The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly.

¶28

Sd/- (P.V.ASHA, JUDGE)

¶29

rtr/

¶30

W.P(c).No.28164/2020-U

¶31

¶32

APPENDIX

¶33

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶34

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.6.2020 IN WPC NO 11820 OF 2020.

¶35

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.10.2015 IN WPC NO 20874 OF 2015.

¶36

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE SPL. JUDGE, VIGILANCE COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AGAINST THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

¶37

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.9.2020 OF THE SPECIAL JUDGE IN VC.2/17/TVM.

C.Bhaskaran v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Bhaskaran v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.K.Jayakumar Vs Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board

Anitha K.A. Vs a.Shajahan

Rajan Gopalan Vs the Divisional Forest Officer

Akhila Kurian Alias Akhila Ann Baby Vs the Union of India

Ajitha Muralidharan Vs the Kerala State Financial Enterprises

Praveen R.V Vs Director of Medical Education