Disposed

Jayalekshmi.v. v. the Kerala Stae Road Transport Corporation

Kerala HC28 Jan 2020WP(C)/2299/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged the non-sanctioning of Provident Fund loans by the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation. The Court directed the respondents to sanction the loans within one month.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to sanction the Provident Fund loans applied for by the petitioners within a time limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of

Jayalekshmi.v. Vs the Kerala Stae Road… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 8TH MAGHA, 1941

¶5

WP(C).No.2299 OF 2020(J)

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

1 JAYALEKSHMI.V. AGED 41 YEARS D/O.T.VIJAYAKUMAR, U.D.TYPIST, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM DEPOT (RESIDING AT PARVANAM, KARUVATTA P.O., ALAPPUZHA).

¶8

2 V.SANTHOSHKUMAR, CONDUCTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HARIPAD DEPOT (RESIDING AT SANTHOSH BHAVANAM, KARUVATTA SOUTH, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690517)

¶9

3 HARIKUMAR K.G.,

¶10

ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOLLAM DEPOT, (RESIDING AT KUMARAMANGALAM, PALACKAL, THEVALAKKARA P.O., KOLLAM).

¶11

4 VINUKUMAR.R.,

¶12

ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HARIPAD DEPOT, (RESIDING AT KULAPPURAKKAL THECKATHIL, OLAKETTIYAMBALAM P.O., MAVELIKKARA).

¶13

5 SAJIKUMAR.S., AGED 51 YEARS,SUPERINTENDENT, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE DEPOT, (RESIDING AT BOSEMANDIRAM, MATTOM THEKKEMURI, THATTARAMBALAM P.O., MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA-690103).

¶14

6 RAKESH A.S., AGED 37 YEARS

¶15

CONDUCTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HARIPAD DEPOT (RESIDING AT SOUPARNIKA, CHEPPAD P.O., CHEPPAD-690507).

¶16

7 SUNILKUMAR.V.,

¶17

AGED 47 YEARS,SUPERINTENDENT, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOLLAM DEPOT, (RESIDING AT SUNILBHAVAN, KANNAMANGALAM NORTH, CHETTIKULANGARA P.O., MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA-690106).

¶18

BY ADV. SRI.K.P.JUSTINE(KARIPAT)

¶19

W.P.(C).No. 2299/2020

¶20

¶21

RESPONDENT/S:

¶22

1 THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023.

¶23

2 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695023.

¶24

3 THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND THE CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695023.

¶25

4 THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, PF SECTION, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023.

¶26

5 THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695023.

¶27

6 THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM DEPOT-682011.

¶28

7 THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HARIPAD DEPOT-690514.

¶29

8 THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOLLAM DEPOT-690518.

¶30

9 THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE DEPOT-673001.

¶31

SRI.T.P.SAJAN, SC, KSRTC

¶32

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶33

W.P.(C).No. 2299/2020

¶34

¶35

JUDGMENT

¶36

The petitioners have approached this Court aggrieved by the nonsanctioning of Provident Fund loans by the respondent Corporation.

¶37

The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation would submit that the loans applied for by the petitioners can be sanctioned within a month.

¶38

Taking note of the said submission, the writ petition is disposed by directing the respondents to sanction the Provident Fund loans applied for by the petitioners within an outer time limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the respondents for further action.

¶39

Sd/- JUDGE

¶40

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

¶41

okb/28.1.2020

¶42

//True copy// P.S. to Judge

¶43

W.P.(C).No. 2299/2020

¶44

¶45

APPENDIX

¶46

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶47

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE 1ST PETITIONER.	DUTY PASS	ISSUED TO THE
EXHIBIT P1(A)	TRUE COPY OF THE 2ND PETITIONER.	DUTY PASS	ISSUED TO THE
EXHIBIT P1(B)	TRUE COPY OF THE 3RD PETITIONER.	DUTY PASS	ISSUED TO THE
EXHIBIT P1(C)	TRUE COPY OF THE 4TH PETITIONER.	DUTY PASS	ISSUED TO THE
EXHIBIT P1(D)	TRUE COPY OF THE 5TH PETITIONER.	DUTY PASS	ISSUED TO THE
EXHIBIT P1(E)	TRUE COPY OF THE 6TH PETITIONER.	DUTY PASS	ISSUED TO THE
EXHIBIT P1(F)	TRUE COPY OF THE 7TH PETITIONER.	DUTY PASS	ISSUED TO THE
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILS OF THE LO PETITIONERS.	STATEMENT ANS APPLIE	SHOWING THE D BY THE

Jayalekshmi.v. v. the Kerala Stae Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayalekshmi.v. v. the Kerala Stae Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Muneer, Vs the Secretary

Mohammed Vs Radhakrishnan P

Susan Rajan Vs the Secretary

Manoj.P.R. Vs the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

K. Anilkumar Vs Beena N.S.

Abdurahiman T.K Vs the Secretary