notified ward itself. In case of non availability of suitable building in the notified ward, sanction would be accorded to shift the shop to the adjacent ward only after ascertaining the convenience of cardholders through local bodies. It is stated that the decision of the local body is also considered with due importance before final orders are issued, going by the prevailing practice. It is further stated that the building proposed by the petitioner is 11 km away from the present building and moreover as per Ext.R2(e) resolution the Panchayat has expressed its dissent against shifting the depot from ward no.1 to ward no.4. It is also stated that there is another depot within 1 km from the proposed building in ward no.4. Ext.R2(f) order dt.19.6.2020 was issued after considering all these aspects. It is the further contention of the respondent that under the National Food Security Act, 2013, which is implemented in the State from 1.11.2016, the role of local bodies is important for the functioning of targeted public distribution system and it is the responsibility of the local authorities for the proper implementation of the Act in the respective areas. It is also stated that as at present portability facility is available to cardholders to procure rationed articles from any ration shop. It is stated that as per Ext.R2(g) letter dated 16.10.2019, the Government had rejected the request of the petitioner for opening a subcentre. At that time also, the facility for portability was mentioned by the Government. It is stated that the appeal submitted by the petitioner against Ext.R2(f) order is pending consideration.
