Partly allowed

P.R.Sasidharan, v. Handicrafts Development Corporation of Kerala Ltd.

Kerala HC7 Jan 2020WP(C)/202/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of a writ petition challenging a transfer order. The court directed the Managing Director to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the transfer and hardship.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner transferred matter dismissed. W. P. disposed of directing 2nd respondent to consider representation and pass orders within two weeks.

P.R.Sasidharan, Vs Handicrafts Development Corporation… — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 17TH POUSHA, 1941

¶5

WP(C).No.202 OF 2020(A)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

P.R.SASIDHARAN, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.V.K.RAGHAVAN, SASHI BHAVAN, KARAKKAD P.O., CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - 689 504. (NOW WORKING AS HELPER, KAIRALI THIRUVALLA, A UNIT OF HANDICRAFTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD.)

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.S.M.ALTHAF

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 HANDICRAFTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REGISTERED OFFICE, PUTHENCHANTHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

¶11

2 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HANDICRAFTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA (HDCK), POST BOX NO.170, PUTHENCHANTHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

¶12

3 R.ANIRAJ, HELPER, KARALI ERNAKULAM, A UNIT OF HANDICRAFTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD. - 682 016.

¶13

BY ADV. SMT.LATHA ANAND,SC

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C).No.202 OF 2020

¶16

¶17

JUDGMENT

¶18

The petitioner, who is working as a Helper

¶19

in the 1^st respondent Corporation, is aggrieved by Ext.P1 order by which he is transferred from Thiruvalla Unit to Thrissur.

¶20

2. Aggrieved by the same, he has submitted Ext.P2 representation before the 1^st respondent

¶21

pointing out the hardship faced by him including the meagre salary admissible to his post.

¶22

Therefore the writ petition is disposed of

¶23

directing the 2^nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation, within a period of

¶24

two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

¶25

this judgment.

¶26

Sd/P.V.ASHA JUDGE

¶27

¶28

WP(C).No.202 OF 2020

¶29

¶30

APPENDIX

¶31

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶32

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY DATED 24/ RESPONDENT.	OF THE 12/2019	ORDER NO.80/P&A/HDCK/PA ISSUED BY THE 2ND
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY 3/01/2020 S THE PETITIO	OF TH UBMITTED NER.	E REPRESENTATION DATED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY 25/02/2017.	OF THE	G.O.(P) NO.3/2017 DATED
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY RESPONDENT	OF THE DATED 2/0	ORDER ISSUED BY 2ND 8/2019.

P.R.Sasidharan, v. Handicrafts Development Corporation of Kerala Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.R.Sasidharan, v. Handicrafts Development Corporation of Kerala Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Arifa Beevi Vs the Chairman, Kerala State Handloom Deve

Arjunan Vs Union of India

Janardhanan K. Vs Union of India

Abhilashkumar S Vs the Travancore Devaswom Board

K.P.M. Jayanthan Namboothiri Vs the State of Kerala

K.Balakrishnan Nair Vs Union of India