Disposed

Annie Thomas v. the District Collector

Kerala HC10 Nov 2020WP(C)/20035/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Collector to expeditiously consider and dispose of a representation filed by the petitioners as Exhibit P6. The Court held that the representation had been passed on and no further order was required.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; no further orders required as the representation (P6) was passed on by the respondent.

Annie Thomas Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 19TH KARTHIKA, 1942

¶5

WP(C).No.20035 OF 2020(D)

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

1 ANNIE THOMAS, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O.THOMAS ISAAC, MADATHIMYALIL HOUSE, 35/188, NH 47, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN-682025.

¶8

2 THOMAS ISAAC, S/O. LATE JUSTICE M.U. ISAAC, MADATHIMYALIL HOUSE, 35/188, NH 47, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN-682025.

¶9

BY ADVS. SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682030.

¶12

2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, 1ST FLOOR, K.B.JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI, KOCHI-682001.

¶13

3 EDAKKATTUVAYAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT, EDAKKATTUVAYAL, ARAKKUNNAM-682313, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY.

¶14

4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAKKATTUVAYAL VILLAGE OFFICE, ARAKKUNNAM-682313.

¶15

5 THE TAHSILDAR- KANAYANNUR TALUK, KANAYANNUR, PARK AVENUE, NEAR SUBHASH PARK, KOCHI-682011.

¶16

6 GEORGE KODIMATTATHIL, KODIMATTATHIL HOUSE, EDAKKATTUVAYAL, ARAKKUNNAM-682313.

¶17

SRI K P HARISH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

WP(C).No.20035 OF 2020(D)

JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~

The grievance of the petitioners concerns the non-consideration of Exhibit P6 representation submitted by the petitioners before the respondents. Though various other reliefs are sought for in the writ petition, the solitary request of Sri. Abraham Joseph Markos, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is for a direction to the 1st respondent to take up, consider and dispose of Exhibit-P6 representation in an expeditious manner.

¶24

The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that the 1st respondent has in fact passed on Ext.P6.

¶25

In that view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the instant case. This petition is disposed of. If the petitioner is in any way aggrieved, he may work out his remedies in accordance with law.

¶26

SD/-

¶27

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

sru

¶30

WP(C).No.20035 OF 2020(D)

¶31

¶32

APPENDIX

¶33

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶34

EXHIBIT	P1 TRUE COPY OF TITLE DEED DATED 10.10.1995 REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NO.3257/1995 BEFORE THE SUB REGISTRAR, PIRAVOM.
EXHIBIT	P1(A) TRUE COPY OF TAX RECEIPT DATED 23.4.2020 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAKKATTUVAYAL VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT	P2 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 21.7.2011 FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT TAHSILDAR.
EXHIBIT	P3 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 7.10.2017 FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAKKATTUVAYAL VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT	P4 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 1.12.2017 FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT EDAKKATTUVAYAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT.
EXHIBIT	P5 TRUE COPY OF SURVEY SKETCH OF THE AREA OBTAINED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT	P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 8.6.2020 FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS.

¶35

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL

¶36

//TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE

Annie Thomas v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Annie Thomas v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subaida Muhammadali Vs the State of Kerala

Boban John Vs State of Kerala

Elamma Lukose Vs Febin M. Jose

Johny Thomas Vs District Collector

Ramesh M.B., Vs the Transport Commissioner

Thankaraj Vs State of Kerala