Sujith.a.S v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition before the Kerala High Court, the petitioner challenged the delay by the District Collector in acting upon his representation. The Court directed the District Collector to consider the matter and pass appropriate orders within one month while issuing notice to a third party respondent.
What did the court decide?
The District Collector to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P12 representation and issue notice to the 3rd respondent within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1942
WP(C).No.17614 OF 2020(S)
PETITIONER:
SUJITH.A.S, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. SUBRAMANIAN, RESIDING AT ARAMANGALAM VEEDU, THIRUNELLI P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN-670 646. BY ADVS. SRI.P.T.DINESH SRI.M.A.SHAJI
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAULAM, PIN-682 030.
2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKAKARA NORTH, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 024. 3 T.S.ABOOBACKER, S/O. SAITH MUHAMMED, 19/THEKKE THAMARACHALIL HOUSE, VADACODE P.O., KANGARAPPADY, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 021.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the District Collector should be directed to pass orders on the petitioner's representation regarding building permit and tax issues.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sujith.A.S
- respondent
The District Collector, Civil Station, Kakkanad
- respondent
The Village Officer, Thrikkakara North
- respondent
T.S.Aboobacker
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court