Johnson v. John, v the Chief Controller of Explosives
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn after the matter was settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2020/12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
WP(C).No.16021 OF 2019(C)
PETITIONER:
JOHNSON V JOHN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.LATE JOHN V.I., RESIDING AT VENDRAPPILLIL HOUSE, COCHIN PALACE P.O., TRIPUNITHURA, KARINGACHIRA JUNCTION, ERNAKULAM -682 301.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.N.ABHILASH SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT
RESPONDENTS:
WP(C) No.16021/2019
: 2 :
5 THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (RETAIL SALES), INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., KERALA STATE OFFICE, PANAMPILLY AVENUE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR P.O., COCHIN - 682 036.
R1-3 BY ADV. SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA R4-5 BY ADV. SRI.C.S.DIAS R4-5 BY ADV. SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN R4-5 BY ADV. SMT.MARIA ELIZABETH WILSON R4-5 BY ADV. DR.THUSHARA JAMES
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.16021/2019
: 3 :
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter stands settled out of court. The writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH, JUDGE
aks/03.12.2020
JOHNSON V JOHN
THE CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES SAFETY ORGANIZATION
THE DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES SAFETY ORGANIZATION
THE DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES SAFETY ORGANIZATION
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION
THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (RETAIL SALES), INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.
N.NAGARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court