The court received a writ petition where the petitioner submitted that subsequent events rendered prosecution unnecessary. The court closed the petition as infructuous on the date of hearing.
The writ petition was closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY,THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2020/11TH AGRAHAYANA,1942
WP(C).No.13835 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONER:
A.K. SHIJI, W/O.JAYARAJAN,AGED ALLINGAL HOUSE, KEEZHATTUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.T.V.NEEMA
RESPONDENTS:
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. RASHMI K.M.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.13835/2020
: 2 :
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner does not want to prosecute the case in view of the subsequent events. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH, JUDGE
aks/02.12.2020
A.K. SHIJI
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT
THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, UPHILL
THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER
N.NAGARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
