K.V. Pareed v. District Police Chief
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition filed by a contractor for protection to carry out tree cutting and removal works was disposed of on the same day it was heard. The court directed the Second Respondent to monitor work and maintain law and order, subject to undertakings given by the parties to proceed peaceably without obstruction.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 31ST BHADRA, 1942
WP(C).No.14655 OF 2020(F)
PETITIONER:
K.V. PAREED AGED 60 YEARS S/O.VEERAN, KUNNATHAN HOUSE, KOTTAPADY P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM - 686 692.
BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY
RESPONDENTS:
1 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF KOLLAM RURAL DISTRICT, KOTTARAKKARA - 691 506.
2 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THENMALA, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 308.
- 3 ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER O/O THE ASST. LABOUR OFFICER, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691305.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Second Respondent should afford effective protection to the petitioner and his employees to carry out the works in terms of the agreement?
Whether the petitioners undertaking to provide work to registered workers and the Union's undertaking to ensure peaceful execution of work should be complied with by the Second Respondent?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.V. Pareed
- respondent
District Police Chief Kollam Rural District
- respondent
The Circle Inspector of Police Thenmala
- respondent
Assistant Labour Officer O/o The Asst. Labour Officer, Punalur
- respondent
B.M.S. Union Aryankavu Region
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court