The court held that the writ petition became infructuous based on submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and dismissed the same without detailed reasoning.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 26TH POUSHA, 1941
WP(C).No.133 OF 2020(N)
PETITIONER:
T.B.SREENIVASAN, VDIKATTU VEEDU, CHERTHALA SOUTH P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENTS:
2 THE TAHSILDAR, NEAR MINI CIVIL STATION, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT PIN 688 524
SMT.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVT. PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.133 OF 2020(N)
2
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
===========================
W.P(C) No.133 of 2020
===========================
Dated this the 16th day of January, 2020
JUDGMENT
The prayers in the above Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows:
WP(C).No.133 OF 2020(N)
3
Recording the abovesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, it is ordered that the above Writ Petition (Civil) will stand dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE
vgd
T.B.Sreenivasan
The District Collector, Alappuzha
The Tahsildar, Chperythala
The Joint Regional Transport Officer, Cherythala
The Regional Transport Officer, Malappuram
Alexander Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
