P.J.Antony v. Peter.D.F
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court set aside its own order that dismissed an application for assignment of disputed puramboke land. It directed the District and Sub Collectors to consider and dispose of the assignment application within two months.
What did the court decide?
The dismissal of the writ petition regarding the assignment application was set aside, and the District and Sub Collectors were directed to consider and dispose of the assignment application within tw
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 3RD MAGHA, 1941
W.A.No.57 OF 2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 41396/2016(Y) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DATED 18.11.19
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
P.J.ANTONY, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.P.K.JOSEPH, PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MOOLAMKUZHI, KOCHI, PIN-682 002.
BY ADV. SRI.P.A.ABDUL JABBAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the application for assignment of the disputed land by relying on the description of the land as a water body in a subordinate order contrary to the fi
Whether the High Court erred in setting aside its own order that declined consideration of the assignment application against the statutory provisions.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.J.Antony
- respondent
Peter.D.F.
- respondent
K.J.Joseph
- respondent
K.R.Simon
- respondent
District Collector, Ernakulam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court