Joshna.M v. Larson Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ appeal was dismissed as infructuous. The court did not engage with the merits of the underlying dispute and treated the appeal as untenable.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of writ appeal as infructuous; closure of pending interlocutory applications.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 27TH POUSHA, 1941
W.A.No.120 OF 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 37518/2016 DATED 14-12-2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
rd APPELLANT/3 RESPONDENT:
JOSHNA.M, W/O.JAYAPRAKASH, 7/543, AASHISH, L.N.PURAM, PALAKKAD - 678 005.
BY ADVS. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H.
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1, 2, 4 & 5:
- 1 LARSON THOMAS
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Joshna.M
- respondent
Larson Thomas
- respondent
The State of Kerala
- respondent
M.S.BRD Securities Private Limited
- respondent
Regional Transport Officer Office of the RTO, Palakkad
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court