Leelamma v. T.M.Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
This regular second appeal was heard on 27.10.2020. The learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo stating the appeal was not pressed, and the memo was recorded by the court.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1942
RSA.No.897 OF 2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 231/2011 DATED 03-04-2014 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE - II, KOTTAYAM
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 188/2010 DATED 27-07-2011 COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 LEELAMMA
AGED 52 YEARS W/O.BENCHAMIN CHERIAN,AXA BHAVAN,PAMPADY SOUTH P.O,PAMPADY SOUTH KARA,P[AMPADY VILLAGE,KOTTAYAM TALUK
2 SANTHAMMA THANKAPPAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Leelamma
- appellant
Santhamma Thankappan
- respondent
T.M. Mathew
- respondent
Saji V Joseph
- respondent
M.M. Balachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court