This appeal was allowed as withdrawn after the parties representing the appellant settled the dispute out of court via a compromise petition filed under Order 21 Rule 3 and Section 151 of the CPC. The court accepted the settlement terms.
The appeal allowed as withdrawn; court fee on memorandum of appeal refunded to appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
INTEEgIGBcoI'RToFKERAI,AATERNAKUI,AD{
PRESENT
TEE BONOURJABLEMR.iIT'STICE C. S.DIAS
T|EDNESDAY,THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2O2O /29TE ASWrliIA',L942
RSA.No.26OF 200t1
AGAINSTEEEDECREEA}ID ''I'DG[{ETIITIN AS 37 lLgg2DATED L8-L2-2OO2 OF ADDITTONALDISTRICTCOttRT '!$IitERI AGAINST TEEDECREEAI{D .'UDGMENT IN OS t62/L989OF MTNSIFF I{AGISTRATECOLRT ,PONNAI'II
KAI{DIRINGATBSUJATEA' D/O.KttNErldAl{,EDAPPAT-,AMSOMA}IDTEInTYAIIDESOM" PONNAI{I TALI'K.
BY ADVS. SRI . T . KRISENANUNNI (SR. ) S![T .MEENA.A. SRI .VINODRAVIIIDRJAIIATE S}8.M.R.MINI SRI .ASEWINSATEYATiTATE
IPIIIEuPARjA}4BILPAI{Gu'ssoNARjN{I'GHA}I, EDAPPAJ.AMSIOMAND TETJrIOM DESOM, 'PONNAbIITALTJI('
2 PIxIEuPARjAMBILPAI{Gu'sDAIIIEER I.AKSE!4I' (DEI,EI[ED) PURATEI'RAr'ffioMAIID DESOM IN'PONNAI{I TALITK'
(21[DRESPoNDET{EIsDELETEDFRoMTEEPARTYARRjAYAT TEERISKoFTEEAPPELI,ATiTTAsPERTHEoRDERDATED L2.O8.2020 rNrA- 7 /2O2O "l
3KARIPPAPARAI.{BILKUNEIKRISENA}I'SsoN@PU'(DELETED) EDAPPATAI.{SOMADID TEUNTOMDESOM,,PONNAI{I TALt'K'
(3RDRESPoIIDENTIsDEI.,ETEDE'RoMTEEPARTYARRAYAT TEERISKoFTBEAPPELI,AI{TAsPERTEEoRDERDATED 12 . 08 .2020rN rA -6/2020 .'
***BAI,AI{,5/o.I,ATEPuIEUPARaI'{BILARjAMUGE.AI{I' SUPPLEMENTPIIIEUPARjN{BIL EOUSE' EDAPPAIAIIISOM AND TEtJgYoM DESOM', AI,ATEPoNNAI{ITAI.I'K'}N..APPI'R]AI'{DIstrRIcT' RESPOIIDENTPIN-579576 .
RSA.No .26 OF 2OO4
ITEE RESPOIIDENII rN IA NO .L/2O2O rS TMPLEJN)ED AS SUPPLEMENTAL 4TB RESPOIIDENT BETNG TEE LEGAL EETR OF DECE.A,SED R1 AS PER ORDER DATED 2L/LO/2020 IN IA No.L/20201
R1 BY ADV. SRT.K.RAIdACEAI{DRA}I Rl BY ADV. SRI.ROEIT NAI{DAIOI,IAR
TErs REG:uI,AR sEcor[D AppEAr, HAVTNG BEEN FrNAr,Ly EEARD oN 21'10 '2020, TEE couRT oN TEE sArtrE DAy DELr\zERED TEE FoLLolrrNG:
RSA.No.26 OF 2004
iII'DGMENT
Dated this the 2 L st day of October 2020
It is submitted that the subject matter in dispute of the above appeal has been settled between the parties out of court. The parties have filed IA.No.Bl2O20, enumerating the terms of compromise.
In the light of the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and the terms and conditions in IA No.8/2020, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. IA.N o.812020 shall form a part of the judgment.
sa/-
C.S.DIAS
JUDGE
ska
%lo 7$ Filed on: 14.10.2020 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF KERALA KERALAAT ERNAKULAMERNAKULAM
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF KERALA KERALAAT ERNAKULAMERNAKULAM
d LA.No. 'r of2020
in
R.S.A. No.26 of 2004 a
: Petitioner/APPellant Kandiringath Sujatha
Vs.
Puthuparambil Balan : Il,espondent/4th ResPondent
COMPROMISE PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 3 AND
SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
AWry:ltY^^!(^,,/'
,/
vr-$*o$N
,''ffi
'll0nu
W
M EENA.A.(M-76 1 )(K-tBt4 /es) COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT .)N'."' g'*
IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM
o' I.A No. D of 2020
in
R.S.A. No26 Of 2004
Petitiner/APPellant
KandiringathSuj ath a, D I o' Kunhiman
Edappal amsomand ThuYYamDesom
Ponnani Taluk,Pin 679576
Respondent/Supplemental4th Respondent:
Balan, S/o.Late Puthuparambil Aramughan
Aged 58, PuthuparambilHouse, Edappal amsom'
Ponnani Taluk,Pin. 679576, lmpleaded as
per order dt: l2-08-2020
is the defendantand the respondent here in is the legal heir of the original defendant who was impleadedin the second Appealas per order dt 12-08-2020appellant is no more , Appellants2 and3 were deleted as per order dated 12-08-2020' The suit was decreedex-parteand the ex-parte decree was confirmed in appeal' challenging which the secondaPPeal
A U-'{ "-" M' (l *stul"lhbw
In the abovecircumstances the parties herebyagree that the appealmay be disposed ofas settledout of court permitting the appellant to withdrawthe above appeal andthe court fee paid on the memorandumof appealmay be refunded to the appellant
Date this the3o day of Septembet,2020
s&rattra-"W
Appellant
fb-o u,rW ' Respondent
ADVOCATE
ADVOCATE
COLINSELFOR APPELLANT
COI.INSELFRO RESPONDENT
lnM v'l ^'A*^,h-:do<t't-'PJtoIao
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal can be allowed as withdrawn upon settlement of the dispute between parties.
Whether the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal can be refunded.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Kandiringath Sujatha
Balan
C. S. Dias
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
