This regular second appeal was heard and dismissed because the appellants were neither appearing nor pressing the appeal before the court.
N/A
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
RSA NO.1150 OF 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 28TH ASWINA, 1942
RSA.No.1150 OF 2006
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS 81/2004 OF SUB COURT, PALA AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 81/2002 OF MUNSIF COURT, KANJIRAPPALLY
APPELLANT/S:
3 LEELAMMA, D/O.CHACKO THYKADAVIL HOUSE, PANACKACHIRA BHAGOM,, ERUMELY NORTH VILLAGE.
BY ADVS. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.SUJESH MENON V.B.
RESPONDENT/S:
2 ISSAC, S/O.CHACKO, THYKADAVIL HOUSE PANACKACHIRA BHAGOM, ERUMELY NORTH VILLAGE.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL CYRIAC R1 BY ADV. SMT.N.SINDHU
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20.10.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
RSA NO.1150 OF 2006
C.S.DIAS, J.
======================
RSA No.1150 of 2006
====================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2020.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants
submits that the appellants are not pressing the appeal.
The above said submission is recorded. Hence, the
appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS
JUDGE
Sks/20.10.2020
T.C.JOSEPH
LAZAR
LEELAMMA
JACOB BABU
ISSAC
C.S.DIAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
