Gopinathan v. Rajamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court allowed a review petition. It set aside an earlier appellate judgment dated July 23, 2013, which disposed of the appeal without considering or passing an order on an application for additional evidence filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CPC.
What did the court decide?
The review petition was allowed and the earlier judgment dated 23/07/2013 was reviewed and recalled.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF JULY 2020 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1942
RP.No.452 OF 2014 IN SA. 829/2001
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SA 829/2001 DATED 23-07-2013 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT/DECREE IN AS 222/1992 OF THE DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT/DECREE IN OS 60/1991 OF THE I ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, NEYYATTINKARA
REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
GOPINATHAN, S/O. HARIS, AGED 51,THARISU VEEDU, DHANUVACHAPURAM P.O., NEAR RAILWALY STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN CODE-691306, KERALA STATE.
BY ADVS. SRI.S.V.RAJAN SMT.M.MANJU SRI.R.SUDHISH SRI.R.SANTHOSH (VARKALA)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court is justified in allowing a review petition where the appeal was decided without passing an order on an application for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gopinathan
- respondent
Rajamma
- respondent
Suseela
- respondent
Santha
- respondent
Rajan Alias Unni
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court