Saraswathi v. Kamalakshiamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge of the High Court of Kerala, at the request of the sub-judge, extended the time frame fixed in a previous judgment by six months, finding sufficient cause for the delay.
What did the court decide?
The time frame fixed in the judgment dated 13/1/2020 in RFA No.397/04 is extended for six months.
What the court decided
RFA 397/2004
1 / 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Present:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Wednesday,the 31st day of March 2021/10th Chaithra, 1943
RFA No.397/2004
OS No.3/2003 of the PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA For information purpose only
APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS
- SARASWATHI D/O. KAYINTHARA KAMALAKSHIAMMA, VASUPURAM DESOM, MATTATHUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
- MANI , D/O. KAMALAKSHIAMMA KAYINTHARA HOUSE, VASUPURAM DESOM,, MATTATHUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
- SASIKUMAR, S/O. KAMALAKSHIAMMA KAYINTHARA HOUSE, VASUPURAMDESOM, MATTATHUR, VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a six-month extension of time for implementing the Court's judgment was warranted.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SARASWATHI D/O. KAYINTHARA KAMALAKSHIAMMA
- appellant
MANI
- appellant
SASIKUMAR
- respondent
KAMALAKSHIAMMA
- respondent
SUBHADRA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court