Prasannan v. Julie Giri
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of two regular first appeals via compromise. Parties settled disputes for Rs.4,00,000/-, accepted a demand draft, and requested court fee refunds. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Both appeals disposed of in terms of compromise; Court Fee remitted to be refunded.
What the court decided
IN TEE ETGE COI'RT OF KERJAI.A AT ERNAKUI,AM
PRESENT
TEE EONOI'FUABLE MR. .'IJSTICE T.V.AI{ILKUI4AR
FRIDAY, TEE O6TE DAY OF NOVEMBER 2O2O / 15TE KARTEIKA, Lg42
RFA.No.538 OF 2005
AGAINST TEE i'T'DGMENT AI{D DECREE DATED 15.02 .2006 IN O.S.NO. L54/2003 oF snB corrRT,ATTrNcAr,
APPELIJANT /DEFENDAI T :
PRASATiINAI{..J, S /O . iIAr{ARDEAI.IAT{, GEETEA BEAVAI{, MUDAI(KAI p.O., ATTTNGAL, RESIDING IN p.B.NO.slg, SIILTEAI{ATE OF O}ru{, prN-311, MUSCAT, REPRESENTED By ErS po9{ER OF ATTORNEY EOLDER, RJA!{ADEVr.L. , D/O. ITALITEA}II{A, PAR,AI'{ES?IARA vrr.AsoM, SEAI{GEUCEAKRAITi r.ArIE, TEYCAITD P. O., TEIRIwAI{AI{'TEAPIIRAI,{.
BY ADVS. SRI .VAIKOM N.VIJAYAI{ SRI. P.A}IrYA}I Sl'lT.V.REI{JU S}'tr.REEdIA EARI
RESPOITDEIflI / PI.AINT IFF :
iII'IJIE GIRT, w/o. crRr, AGED 27 yEjARS, JI'BTLEE NTVAS, PuLLooR MUKKU' KALT.AMBAT.AM P.o. , REPRESENTED By EER POgIER OF ATTORNEY EOI,DER M.SATEEESAI{, S/O. NAI{U, AGED 52,, iN,BILEE NIVAS, PT'LLOOR MUI(KU' KALLAII{BAITAI{ P.O., TEIRIT\IAI{ANTEAPI'RAM.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prasannan J
- respondent
Julie Giri
Coram
T.V. Anilkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court