Ranjith v. Ajithkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner aggrieved by refusal of interim custody hearing. Court held remedy is to file protest complaint once charge-sheet filed. Petition dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner allowed liberty to file protest complaint. Original petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1942
OP(Crl.).No.308 OF 2020
CMP 1673/2020 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, PATTAMBI CRIME NO.386/2020 OF Chalissery Police Station, Palakkad
PETITIONER/S:
RANJITH AGED 37 YEARS S/O. KRISHNAN NAMBOOTHIRI, KUMARAPULAKKAL MANA, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALLIPPURAM P.O-679 305, PALAKKAD DISTRICT
BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.T.V.NEEMA SRI.P.T.SHAHUL HAMEED
RESPONDENT/S:
1 AJITHKUMAR AGED 38 YEARS S/O. KUTTAPPAN, KOLLATH VALAPPIL, KOOTTANAD P.O., PATAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-6789 533
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's application for interim custody of the vehicle should be reconsidered after the filing of a final charge-sheet.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ranjith
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
V.G. Arun
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court