Dismissed
Sri.Azeem v. Smt.Jineesha
Kerala HCMat.Appeal/989/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 23RD ASWINA, 1942
Mat.Appeal.No.989 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19-12-2017 IN I.A. NO. 2928/2015 IN OP NO. 680/2014 OF FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
SRI.AZEEM AGED 37 YEARS S/O.IBRAHIMKUTTY, PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VELLANGALLOOR POST, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.S.SREEDEV
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITOINER:
SMT.JINEESHA, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.K.A.MAJEED, 9/608, CHRIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, NETTOOR.P.O., MARADU VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682040.
BY ADV. SRI.A.V.JAMES BY ADV. SRI.O.S.JAFARKHAN
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-062020, THE COURT ON 15-10-2020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mat.Appeal.No.989 OF 2019 2
J U D G M E N T
Haripal, J.
Today we have dismissed C. M. Application No. 1 of 2019, application for condoning the delay in the appeal. In the light of the said order, the Mat. Appeal is barred by limitation and is rejected.
SD/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE
SD/-
K. HARIPAL, JUDGE
eb/12.06.2020
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the matrimonial appeal filed without condoning the delay is barred by limitation?
Whether the conditional application for condoning delay was allowed to regularize the appeal?
Sri.Azeem
Smt.Jineeasha
C.Travikumar
K.Haripal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court