Dismissed
K.O.Itoop v. Unnikrishnan
Kerala HCCrl.Rev.Pet/788/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 1ST POUSHA, 1942
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.788 OF 2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRA 107/2016 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 7276/2012 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHALAKUDY
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
K.O.ITOOP AGED 52 YEARS
S/O OUSEPH, KONUPARAMBAN, CHALAKUDY, PROPRIETOR, KONUPARAMBAN TRADERS, VAZHAKKUNNU, ALOOR, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY, MADHU, S/O NARAYANAN ILAYATH, MANGALASSERY, KORATTY.
BY ADV. SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT NO.2/ACCUSED AND STATE:
1 UNNIKRISHNAN AGED 40 YEARS SREE VIHAR, THURAVOOR P.O.,CHERTHALA , ALAPPUZHA
2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA
OTHER PRESENT:
PP SREEJA V.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.788 OF 2020 ..2..
ORDER
Dated this the 22nd day of December 2020 The explanation of the Filing Scrutiny Officer is accepted. The Criminal R.P. is dismissed, without prejudice to the petitioner's right to file appeal against the acquittal. Registry is directed to return the original documents.
V.G.ARUN
SB/22/12/2020
//true copy //
P.A to Judge
K.O.Itoop
Unnikrishnan
State of Kerala
V.G.Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court