The appellant in this criminal appeal was reported as having expired during the hearing. Accordingly, the court dismissed the appeal on the grounds of abatement without further adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 16TH MAGHA, 1941
CRL.A.No.222 OF 2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN SC 578/2004 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-I), ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
DEVASSYKUTTY,
S/O OUSEPH, MULLOOR HOUSE, KADUVAZHANGA KARA, ALANGAD VILLAGE.
BY DEVASSYKUTTY(PARTY IN PERSON)
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUSHPALATHA M.K. SR PP
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.A.No.222/2005 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 5th day of February 2020
The appellant is reported as expired. Therefore,
appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE
JJ
//true copy// Sd/-
PA TO JUDGE
DEVASSYKUTTY
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
MARY JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
