Sabeela Jabbar v. Nazar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala rejected two regular first appeals (RFA No.329/2007 and RFA No.330/2007) jointly because the appellants failed to pay the balance court fee despite a grant of reasonable time.
What did the court decide?
Appeals rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1941
RFA.No.329 OF 2007
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 23/2001 DATED 23-06-2006 OF SUB COURT, ATTINGAL
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
SABEELA JABBAR, W/O.JABBAR, AATTINAD, GOVT. COLLEGE LANE, ATTINGAL FROM SIMI COTTAGE, MUDAPURAM, KIZHUVILAM DESOM, KIZHUVILAM VILLAGE.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.RAJESH SMT.A.K.PREETHA SRI.PRADEEP.V.S.
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
NAZAR, S/O.ALIYARU KUNJU, AGED 37, COMPANY EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT A1 - SAFA VILLA, KIZHUVILAM DESOM, KIZHUVILAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sabeela Jabbar
- respondent
Nazar
- appellant
S. Abdul Jabbar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court