Anoop C.U. v. Sheeja V.A.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt proceedings were closed as the Devaswom Board informed the Court that it had complied with the judgment directions regarding vacancies.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Case closed; no liability imposed on the respondent.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Con.Case(C).Nos.925 & 933 OF 2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.925 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 22398/2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22398/2019(Y) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
ARUN BALACHANDRAN AGED 28 YEARS S/O.(LATE) K.S.BALACHANDRAN, RESIDING AT UPPUTTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHIYEDOM, VELLARAPPILLY SOUTH P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 580.
BY ADVS. SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR SHRI.NIKITHA ANTONY
RESPONDENT/S:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ARUN BALACHANDRAN
- respondent
SHEEJA V.A.
- petitioner
ANOOP C.U.
- respondent
SHEEJA V.A.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court