The contemnor proved a notice dated 8.4.2019 was issued. The petitioner described the contempt case as not pressed. The judge dismissed the case on that ground.
The Contempt of Court case is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
TUESDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 Con.Case(C).No.1406 OF 2019 IN WP(C)No. 26280/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 26280/2018(H) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SREENA PRASAD P.N. AGED 36 YEARS W/O.SUDHEER.C.B., HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (HINDI), ST.AUGUSTINE HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KUTTANELLOR, THRISSUR-680545, RESIDING AT CHEMMANGATTU, VALAPPIL HOUSE, CHOORAKKATTUKARA.P.O., AMALA NAGAR, THRISSUR680555.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) SRI.AJEESH K.SASI SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN SRI.P.M.RAFIQ SRI.V.C.SARATH SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN SMT.POOJA PANKAJ SRUTHY N. BHAT
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT:
SULOCHANA, AGED 55 YEARS W/O.PREBHIN, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR - 695001.
GP- SMT. VINITHA.B,
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No.1406/2019 IN WP(C)No.26280/2018
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 1st day of December 2020
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Contempt of Court Case is not pressed. Hence, the Contempt of Court case is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/P.V.ASHA JUDGE
DM
Con.Case(C).No.1406/2019 IN WP(C)No.26280/2018
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 8.4.2019 ADDRESSED TO THE RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Sreena Prasad P.N.
Sulochana
P.V. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
