Shajahan v. Mr.Hamza Kurickel
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam closed a contempt case against respondents for failure to comply with orders. The court recorded compliance after the Land Laws and Land Management Committee deleted specific land from its data bank.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed by recording compliance with the LLMC decision to delete land from data bank.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 30TH ASWINA, 1942 Con.Case(C).No.1601 OF 2016(S) IN WP(C). 15830/2016
JUDGMENT DATED 26.04.2016 IN WPC 15830/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
SHAJAHAN, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL SAMAD, KOZHISSERY HOUSE, VETATHOOR, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.C.A.NAVAS SMT.E.G.AMBILY SMT.NAJMA T. RASHEED SRI.T.K.SASIKUMAR SRI.P.A.SHAJI SAMAD SRI.C.J.SOLOMAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 MR.HAMZA KURICKEL, THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER AND CONVENER OF LLMC (PRESENT), OFFICE OF THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, PANDIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, 677 001.
2 MRS.HRUDHYA, THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER AND CONVENER OF LLMC (FORMER), OFFICE OF THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, PANDIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, 677 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shajahan
- respondent
Mr. Hamza Kurickel
- respondent
Mrs. Hrudhya
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court