Muhammed v. Mohammed Ali
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the contempt of court case, which was granted by the court on 21.10.2020, resulting in the dismissal of the case.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the contempt case was granted, leading to the dismissal of the case.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 29TH ASWINA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.1375 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 35659/2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35659/2019(F) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
MUHAMMED, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. ABDU RAHIMAN HAJI, KODAKKODAN HOUSE, POOVATHINKAL P.O, URUNGATTIRI VILLAGE, ERNAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676 311
BY ADVS. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.) SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.R.GITHESH SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA SRI.AJAY BEN JOSE SRI.MANJUNATH MENON SHRI.HARIKRISHNAN S.
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 MOHAMMED ALI, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL KHADER, KARIMUDIKKAL HOUSE, THRIKALANGODE AMSOM, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 127
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUHAMMED
- respondent
MOHAMMED ALI
- respondent
MOHAMMED NOUSHAD
- respondent
FAISAL
- respondent
ALAVI C
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court