M.Santhakumari v. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court closed a writ petition regarding pension arrears after the respondents granted the claimed pension amount, deeming the cause substantially redressed.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed; petitioner granted liberty to recall order if dissatisfied.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1941
WP(C).No.5998 of 2019
PETITIONER:
M.SANTHAKUMARI AGED 60 YEARS W/O.SETHUMADHAVAN, RETD.ANCILLARY LABOUR, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, OLAVAKKODE, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PALAKKAD, RESIDING AT MOOCHIKKAL HOUSE, ALLATH PARAMBA, PUDUPARIYARAM, PALAKKAD-678 501
BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, REGIONAL OFFICE,BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, ERANHIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 006
2 THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, NO.37,ROYAPETTAH HIGH ROAD, OPPOSITE SWAGAT HOTEL CHENNAI,TAMILNADU-600 014 3 THE AREA MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, DISTRICT OFFICE,PALAKKAD-678 731 4 THE MANAGER (LABOUR PENSION),FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, CHENAI-600 001
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the exercise of the writ petition is closed after arrears of pension were granted to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Santhakumari
- respondent
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization
- respondent
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization
- respondent
Area Manager Food Corporation of India
- respondent
Manager Labour Pension Food Corporation of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court