Green Oasis Regency Hotel v. Muttom Grama Panchayat
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
SATURDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 4TH KARTHIKA, 1941
WP(C).No.37383 OF 2016(W)
PETITIONER/S:
GREEN OASIS REGENCY HOTEL P O MUTTOM, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR SONY THOMAS.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 MUTTOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT MUTTOM P O, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685587, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY.
2 THE STANDING COMMITTEE FOR FINANCE MUTTOM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUTTOM P O, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685587, REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN.
3 THE TAHSILDAR(R.R) REVENUE RECOVERY , TALUK OFFICE, THODUPUZHA, PIN- 685584.
R1 BY ADV. SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL R1, R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER R1 BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR R1 BY ADV. SMT.RESHMI JACOB R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.U.SUJITH KUMAR R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SYAMKUTTAN
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.N.B.SUNILNATH, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.37383 OF 2016(W) 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of October 2019
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent demand had been issued on the petitioner and that the same has been considered in a subsequent writ petition. In the above view of the matter, the writ petition has become
infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
rmm
Green Oasis Regncy Hotel P O Muttom
Muttom Grama Panchayat
The Standing Committee for Finance Muttom Grama Panchayath
The Tahsildar (R.R) Revenue Recovery
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court