The Court closed the writ petition as infructuous after a Government Order rescinded the impugned order of the Panchayat. The petitioner was directed to refund any interim amounts paid.
The writ petition is closed as infructuous; petitioner to refund interim amounts paid if Government Order is not varied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 3RD KARTHIKA, 1941
WP(C).No.501 OF 2012(K)
PETITIONER:
RUGMINI SUBRAMANIYAN, AGED 38 YEARS, KAKKADATH HOUSE, VAKARI P.O., SULTHAN BANTHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.M.PRASANTH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE POOTHADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KENICHIRA P.O., WAYANAD-673 596.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD, CIVIL STATION, KALPETTA NORTH, WAYANAD-673 591.
3 THE ASST. ENGINEER, POOTHADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KENICHIRA P.O., WAYANAD-673 596.
BY ADVS. R1 BY SRI.S.ASOK KUMAR R1 BY SRI.P.C.GOPINATH R2 BY SRI.N.B.SUNILNATH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.501 OF 2012(K)
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed challenging Exts.P7 and P10
proceedings of the Secretary of the 1st respondent Grama Panchayath.
Subject to any challenge by the Panchayath as against Government Order dated 04.06.2018, this writ petition is closed as infructuous, taking note of the Government Order. The
WP(C).No.501 OF 2012(K)
3
amounts paid by the petitioner pursuant to interim orders of this Court shall be refunded to the petitioner, in case the
Government Order is not varied.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
Skk//011119
WP(C).No.501 OF 2012(K)
4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
| EXHIBIT P1 | TRUE THE R |
COPY OF THE ESPONDENT P |
LETTER DATED 15.12.11 ISSUED BY ANCHAYAT |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXHIBIT P2 | TRUE | COPY OF THE | COMPLAINT DATED 19.10.09 |
| EXHIBIT P3 | TRUE | COPY OF THE | EXPLANATION DATED 26.11.09 |
| EXHIBIT P4 | TRUE | COPY OF THE | EXPLANATION DATED 01.12.09 |
| EXHIBIT P5 | TRUE | COPY OF THE | COMMUNICATION DATED 18.12.09. |
| EXHIBIT P6 | TRUE PROGR |
COPY OF THE AM CO-ORDIN |
SAID RECOMMENDATION OF THE JOINT ATOR OF MRGS DATED 28.02.11 |
| EXHIBIT P7 | TRUE 27.07 |
COPY OF THE .11 |
ORDER NO.A1-8085/11 DATED |
| EXHIBIT P8 | TRUE | COPY OF THE | REPRESENTATION DATED 06.07.11 |
| EXHIBIT P9 | TRUE | COPY OF THE | REPRESENTATION DATED 22.09.11 |
| EXHIBIT P10 | TRUE 14.11 |
COPY OF THE .2011 |
ORDER NO.A1/8085/11 DATED |
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rugmini Subramaniyan
The Poothadi Grama Panchayath
The District Collector, Wayanad
The Asst. Engineer, Poothadi Grama Panchayath
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
