Dismissed

Pushpa.S. v. Mahatma Gandhi University and Another

Kerala HC28 Jan 2019WP(C)/37023/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions challenging selection/appointment of Lower Division Typists by Mahatma Gandhi University based on written and skill test marks. The court held petitions infructuous as no interim directions were issued since 2009.

What did the court decide?

Petitions closed as infructuous; liberty of petitioners to raise grievances before appropriate authorities reserved.

Pushpa.S. Vs Mahatma Gandhi University and Another — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN

¶4

MONDAY ,THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 8TH MAGHA, 1940

¶5

WP(C).No. 36974 of 2009

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

GEETHA M.K., MALEKKAL VAYAL HOUSE, ELOOR SOUTH, UDYOGAMANDAL, ERNAKULAM.

¶8

BY ADVS. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH

¶9

RESPONDENT/S:

¶10

1 MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM.

¶11

2 THE REGISTRAR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM.

¶12

BY ADVS. SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.01.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).37023/2009, WP(C)NO. 37739/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

W.P.(C) Nos.36974, 37023 & 37739/2009

¶15

-2-

¶16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶17

PRESENT

¶18

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN

¶19

MONDAY ,THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 8TH MAGHA, 1940

¶20

WP(C).No. 37023 of 2009

¶21

PETITIONER/S:

¶22

PUSHPA.S., PUSHPA NIVAS, ONAMTHURUTHU P.O., KAIPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686602.

¶23

BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR

¶24

RESPONDENT/S:

¶25

1 MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADHARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM.

¶26

2 THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADHARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM.

¶27

BY ADVS. SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY

¶28

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.01.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).36974/2009, WP(C).37739/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶29

W.P.(C) Nos.36974, 37023 & 37739/2009

¶30

-3-

¶31

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶32

PRESENT

¶33

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN

¶34

MONDAY ,THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 8TH MAGHA, 1940

¶35

WP(C).No. 37739 of 2009

¶36

PETITIONER/S:

¶37

1 SHYLAJA T.P. SHIVAVILASOM, THOPPIPPALA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.

¶38

2 SHAMMY JOHN VEZHAPARAMBAN HOUSE, KORATTY EAST P.O., THIRUMUDIKKUNNU, THRISSUR - 680308.

¶39

BY ADV. SRI.T.V.VINU

¶40

RESPONDENT/S:

¶41

1 MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM -686560.

¶42

2 REGISTRAR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686560.

¶43

BY ADVS. SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY

¶44

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.01.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).36974/2009, WP(C).37023/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶45

W.P.(C) Nos.36974, 37023 & 37739/2009

¶46

-4-

¶47

JUDGMENT

¶48

These writ petitions were filed in the year 2009, seeking

¶49

the issue of writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to make selection and appointment to all existing vacancies of Lower Division Typists, on the basis of the total marks scored in written test and skill test, by the 53 candidates who appeared in the skill test held on 30.10.2009.

¶50

No interim direction had been issued in the writ petitions. I am of the opinion that the grievance of the petitioners cannot be considered at this point of time. Hence, the writ petitions are closed as infructuous, reserving the liberty of the petitioners to raise their grievances, if any, before the appropriate authorities.

¶51

Sd/-

¶52

V.G.ARUN JUDGE

¶53

scl/28.01

Pushpa.S. v. Mahatma Gandhi University and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpa.S. v. Mahatma Gandhi University and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pushpalatha E.V. Vs the Kerala Agricultural University

P.S.Indu Vs State of Kerala

Thamban K. Vs Payyannur Muncipality

Shylaja T.P. & Another Vs Mahatma Gandhi University and Another

Rinshad Abdulla Vs Sibga Institute of Advanced Studies, Rep. by Its Principal

Aparna S Anil Vs the Vice Chancellor University of Kerala