Girish Nayak v. Ratheesh B
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner as infructuous based on the submission that the challenge had no residual benefit.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941
WP(C).No.32475 OF 2019(H)
PETITIONER:
GIRISH NAYAK AGED 42 YEARS S/O.B.VENKATESH NAYAK, NAYAKS ENTERPRISES, MAIN ROAD, KANHANGAD, NEAR KANHANGAD BUS STAND, P.O.KANHANGAD, PIN-671314.
BY ADVS. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN
RESPONDENTS:
1 RATHEESH B S/O.BHASKARAN, KAMBER ROHINI HOUSE, NEAR BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE, P.O.BEKAL, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671318.
2 VIDEOCON,
OFFICE PLOT NO.296, UDYOG BIHAR, PHASE-2, GURGAON, HARYANA, PIN-110038, PRESENTLY REPRESENTED BY SRI. ANUP JAIN, INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL, VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD., UDYOG BIHAR, PHASE-2, SECTOR 20, GURGAON, HARYANA, PIN-122008.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Girish Nayak
- respondent
Ratheesh B
- respondent
Videocon
- respondent
The Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Kasaragod
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court