Mariyumma v. the Authorised Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither party appeared for representation in the forenoon nor did the petitioner seek accommodation for an adjournment.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
MONDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 13TH KARTHIKA, 1941 WP(C).No.31844 OF 2018(E)
PETITIONER:
MARIYUMMA AGED 68 YEARS W/O SEEDIKUNHI, ARIYAL P.O, KUDLU, KASRAGOD DISTRICT 671124
BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.SUBHASH SMT.S.ANU
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER THE KERALA GRAMIN BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE,TIGER HILL BUILDING ,MUNCIPAL OFFICE ROAD, KASARAGOD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT 671121
2 THE BRANCH MANAGER KERALA GRAMIN BANK, MOGRALPUTHUR BRANCH, KASARAGOD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 671124
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATH R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI R1 BY ADV. SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.KURYAN THOMAS R1 BY ADV. SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mariyumma
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, The Kerala Gramin Bank
- respondent
The Branch Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court