Allowed

Abdul Latheef v. the Kerala Football Association

Kerala HC26 Mar 2019WP(C)/204/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions filed by football players regarding disputes with football associations were disposed of. The Court held that parties had resolved their disputes via a mediated settlement agreement and directed compliance with said agreement.

What did the court decide?

Parties directed to comply with obligations under the mediated settlement agreement; agreement made part of judgment.

Abdul Latheef Vs the Kerala Football Association — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

¶4

TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1941

¶5

WP(C).No. 171 of 2019

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

1 AJITH K, AGED 35 YEARS S/O. VELAYUDHAN, KOTTUPATTA ACHACHAVADI HOUSE, KALIKKAVU (PO), MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PRESENT MANAGER OF THE TEAM SMAK MEDIA FC (SABAN KOTTAKKAL)

¶8

2 DOSSO ABOUBAKAR SINDOU, S/O. DOSSO BOBUE, YUPUGON QUATIER MAROC ABID JAN, COTE DIVOIRE, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O. AJITH K, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, KOTTUPATTA ACHACHAVADI HOUSE, KALIKKAVU (PO), MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADVS. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ SMT.T.S.SREEKUTTY

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

1 THE KERALA FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION, VIP SECTOR A, FIRST FLOOR, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU INTERNATIONAL STADIUM KALOOR, COCHIN 682 017

¶12

2 SEVENS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION STATE COMMITTEE REG NO. TSR/TC/493/2015 PARIS BUILDING, WARD V, ROOM NO. 100, MUNDOOR (PO), PIN 680 541 TRISSUR DISTRICT

¶13

3 ROYAL TRAVELS ARTS AND SPORTS CLUB REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER MUSTHAFA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ROYAL TRAVELS KOZHIKODE, PIN 673 661 MAVOOR ROAD, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

¶14

4 THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETY MALAPPURAM CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM, PIN 676 504.

¶15

WP(C).No. 171 of 2019 & CON.CASE 2

¶16

BY ADVS. SHRI.HALVI K.S. SHRI.IRSHAD K.K. SMT.PARVATHY S.KRISHNAN R1 SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY R2. SRI.RAJIT R3 SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH R4 SMT. RESMI K.M.GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.03.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).204/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

WP(C).No. 171 of 2019 & CON.CASE 3

¶19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶20

PRESENT

¶21

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

¶22

TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1941

¶23

WP(C).No. 204 of 2019

¶24

PETITIONER/S:

¶25

1 ABDUL LATHEEF AGED 46 YEARS S/O. ALAVIKUTTY, PULLISSERY HOUSE, KALPAKANCHERY (PO), PIN TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PRESENT MANAGER OF THE TEAM SUPER STUDIO MALAPPURAM.

¶26

2 KARGBO ABULAI AGED 22 YEARS S/O. OSMAN, 2W, KISSYBROOK, FREETOWN, SIERRA LEONEAN

¶27

PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O. ABDUL LATHEEF, S/O. ALAVIKUTTY, PULLISSERY HOUSE, KALPAKANCHERY P.O, PIN TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

¶28

BY ADVS. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ SMT.T.S.SREEKUTTY

¶29

RESPONDENT/S:

¶30

1 THE KERALA FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION VIP SECTOR A, FIRST FLOOR, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU INTERNATIONAL STADIUM KALOOR, COCHIN-682 017

¶31

2 SEVENS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION STATE COMMITTEE REG. NO. TSR/TC/493/2015, PARIS BUILDING, WARD V, ROOM NO. 100, MUNDOOR P.O, PIN-680 541,

¶32

WP(C).No. 171 of 2019 & CON.CASE 4

¶33

THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶34

3 LINSHA MEDICALS FOOTBALL TEAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER SHAMEER BABU M, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, LINSHA MEDICALS, MANNARKAD P.O, PIN-678 582, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

¶35

4 THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETY MALAPPURAM CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM, PIN-676505 BY ADVS.

¶36

SHRI.HALVI K.S. SHRI.IRSHAD K.K. SMT.PARVATHY S.KRISHNAN SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY R4, SMT. PRINCY XAVIER, GOVERNMENT PLEADER R2 SRI.RAJIT R3 SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH

¶37

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.03.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).171/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶38

WP(C).No. 171 of 2019 & CON.CASE 5

¶39

JUDGMENT

¶40

[ WP(C) 171/2019 ,WP(C).204/2019 ]

¶41

The subject matter of the writ petitions are

¶42

dispute between the various football associations. Matter was placed before a mediator and the parties

¶43

have resolved their disputes by entering into a mediated settlement agreement.

¶44

In that view of the matter, the parties are directed to comply with the obligations undertaken by them under the mediated settlement agreement. The mediated settlement agreement is directed to be made part of the judgment. The writ petitions are allowed in terms of the mediated settlement

agreement.

Sd/-

SHAJI P.CHALY

JUDGE

hmh

WP(C).No. 171 of 2019 & CON.CASE 6

¶51

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 171/2019

¶52

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶53

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PASSPORT OF THE 2ND PETITIONER EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE VISA FOR THE PERIOD 24-10-2018 TO 23-04-2019 OF THE 2ND PETITIONER.

¶54

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE FRRO REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR 25-01-2018 TO 24-01-2019. EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE CANCELLED VISA OF THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR 25-01-2018 TO 24-012019. EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT OF THE 3 MEMBER COMMITTEE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20-12-2018.

¶55

EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL.

¶56

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL

¶57

WP(C).No. 171 of 2019 & CON.CASE 7

¶58

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 204/2019

¶59

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶60

EXHIBIT P1	A TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER.	THE	PASSPORT OF THE 2ND
EXHIBIT P2	A TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER.	THE	VISA OF THE 2ND
EXHIBIT P3	A TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE OF 07.12.2018.	THE THE	FRRO REGISTRATION 2ND PETITIONER DATED
EXHIBIT P4	A TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER FOR	THE 29.	VISA OF THE 2ND 04.2016 TO 29.04.2017
EXHIBIT P5	A TRUE COPY VI 11.10.2017 TO	SA F 10.1	OR THE PERIOD 0.2018
EXHIBIT P6	A TRUE COPY OF 3 MEMBER COMMI DATED 20.12.20	THE TTEE 18	ENQUIRY REPORT OF THE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P7	A TRUE COPY OF 2ND RESPONDENT	THE DAT	ORDER PASSED BY THE ED NIL.

¶61

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL

Abdul Latheef v. the Kerala Football Association

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Latheef v. the Kerala Football Association

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Singnet Software Solutions Pvt.Ltd., Vs Smart City (Kochi) Infra Structure Pvt. Ltd.

Sajimon K Vs Union of India

Kasmisons Builders Private Limited Vs State Bank of India

Ajith K, Vs the Kerala Football Association

Sulochana Satheesh, Vs Kerala State Housing Board Limited

Sajeevan.M.N Vs State of Kerala