P.Sundaran v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court accepted the petition's counsel's submission to close the writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash notices and prevent excavator seizure. The order was made without prejudice to the petitioner's right to file a revision under Section 28 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, with the interim order against coercive steps remaining in force.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to pursue a revision under Section 28 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 26TH ASHADHA, 1941
WP(C).No.12716 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
P.SUNDARAN AGED 70 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER, SREELEKSHMI CASHEW COMPANY, LEKSHMIPRABHA, KADAPPAKKADA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
- 2 TAHSILDAR AND EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM-691 506.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner regarding the seizure of an excavator be closed without prejudice to his right to pursue a revision.
Whether the interim order restricting seizure of the excavator remains in force.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.SUNDARAN
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
TAHSILDAR AND EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE
- respondent
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHOOR
- respondent
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHOOR
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court