Gopinathan v. Balan @ Ayyappan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a second appeal as abated after the appellant died before the final hearing in March 2019, noting no successor appeared to proceed.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed as abated due to the death of the appellant without a successor proceeding.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY ,THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1940
SA.No. 478 of 2002
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30-11-2001 IN AS 6/2001 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31-10-1994 IN OS 173/1992 OF MUNSIFF COURT, WADAKKANCHERRY
APPELLANT IN S.A./RESPONDENT IN A.S./PLAINTIFF IN O.S.:
GOPINATHAN,
AGED 52,TEACHER,S/O.PARAKOT CHAMI EZHUTHASSAN, KANIYARKODE, VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR .) SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR (SR.)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal stands dismissed due to abatement after the death of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
GOPINATHAN
- respondent
BALAN @ AYYAPPAN
- respondent
SANKARANARAYANAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court