C.Madhava v. Balakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY,THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1940
RSA.No. 102 of 2004
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 30-08-2003 IN AS 40/1999 of DISTRICT COURT KASARAGOD
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 15-02-1999 IN OS 51/1997 of SUB COURT, HOSDRUG
APPELLANT/FIRST RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
C.MADHAVA, AGED 46 YEARS S/O. KRISHNAPPA, SECRETARY, KUDIRU SREE MOOKAMBIKA, TEMPLE COMMITTEE, RESIDING AT PADMADHAMA, NEAR PANCHALINGESHWARA TEMPLE, LADY HILL, URVA, MANGLORE, KARNATAKA STATE.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.RAJEEVAN SMT.P.S.PREETHA SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 & DEFENDANTS:
1 BALAKRISHNAN H., AGED 74 YEARS S/O. BADRAYYA, HINDU, RETIRED GOVT.SERVANT, RESIDING NEAR CHETTUKUNDU BUS STOP, CHATTUKUNDU, KEEKAN VILLAGE, NOW AT KUDRU HOUSE, CHITTAR, VILLAGE AND POST, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT
2 PADMANABHA VARIKAT THAYAR
AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. PARAMESHWARA VARIKAT THAYAR, HINDU, TANTRI, RESIDING AT VARIKAT IN CHITHARI VILLAGE AND POST, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
3 VAIKUNTA H. AGED 79 YEARS S/O. VENKATARAMAN, HINDU, RETIRED POLICE, CONSTABLE, RESIDING AT PADMAKIRAN NEAR NITHYANANDA ASHRAMAM, HOSDURG VILLAGE, P.O. KANHANGAD, HOSDURG TALUK,, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
4 K. MALLIKARJUNA AGED 32 YEARS S/O. LAKSHMANA, HINDU, DRIVER, RESIDING AT, RAVENESHWARAM, CHITTARI VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. CHITTARI, KASARGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN (SR.)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA No.102/2004
2
JUDGMENT
Appellant and counsel remained absent. Nobody represented the matter. No
steps were taken as against the 3rd respondent and hence the appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
sv
C. MADHAVA
BALAKRISHNAN H.
PADMANABHA VARIKAT THAYAR
VAIKUNTA H.
K. MALLIKARJUNA
P. SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court