Dhanalakshmi v. Rathinam
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal was heard in the absence of the appellant and one respondent. The court observed that the sole appellant died in 2016 and the appeal, having abated, was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed as abated because the appellant passed away.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 16TH MAGHA, 1940
RSA.No. 488 of 2009 (G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13/07/2007 IN AS 347/2003 of II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29/5/2000 IN I.A.NO.25/2001 IN OS 7/1986 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
DHANALAKSHMI, W/O CHUDALA MUTHU AGED 53 YEARS, THEKKE VANIYATHARA,, KIZHAKKATHARA AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK. (DIED)
(The death of the appellant is recorded as per order dated 5.2.2019 in memo dated 9.1.2019)
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
DHANALAKSHMI, W/O CHUDALA MUTHU AGED 53 YEARS
- respondent
RATHINAM, D/O VELAYUDHAN CHETTIAR AGED 52 YEARS
- respondent
SUBHALAKSHMI D/O. VELAYUDHAN CHETTIAR
- respondent
RAJESH S/O. MUTHU @ NACHI MUTHU AGED 24 YEARS
- respondent
VIJAYAN S/O. MUTHU @ NACHI MUTHU, AGED 27 YEARS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court