Thankachan v. Gopalan
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal. Appellant was absent. No response from the party despite notice. Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY ,THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 15TH MAGHA, 1940
RSA.No. 1259 of 2004(G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30-03-2004 IN AS 181/2000 of ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,KOTTAYAM
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27-07-2000 IN O.S.NO.93/1998 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, ETTUMANOOR
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
THANKACHAN S/O KARUMBAN, KUCHAMBANATTU THADATHIL, PEROOR VILLAGE, PEROOR KARA,KOTTAYAM TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW SRI.K.P.SHAHUL HAMEED
RESPONDENTS/APPELLATS/PLAINTIFFS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
THANKACHAN S/O KARUMBAN
- respondent
GOPALAN (PAPPACHAN) S/O KUNJAPPA
- respondent
BABU S/O.GOPALAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court