Paul v. Rosamma
Case brief
What is this about?
This regular second appeal filed in 2004 was apparently not argued or prosecuted on March 20, 2019. The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY,THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1940
RSA.No. 1395 of 2004(G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.9.2004 IN AS 35/1996 of SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 4.8.1995 IN OS 115/1991 of MUNSIFF COURT,MUVATTUPUZHA
APPELLANTS IN THE HIGH COURT/APPELLANTS 3 & 4 IN THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT/DEFENDANTS 3 & 4 IN THE TRIAL COURT:
- 1 PAUL, S/O.JOSEPH, KANJIRAMTHUMKAL RESIDING AT ALAPURAM KARA, ELANJI VILLAGE,, MUVATTUPUZHA.
2 MARY W/O. PAUL RESIDING AT DO. DO.
BY ADV. SRI.H.SIVARAMAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Paul, S/o. Joseph, Kanjiramthumkal
- appellant
Mary, W/o. Paul
- respondent
Rosamma, W/o. Baoffima
- respondent
Varkey, S/o. Paulo
- respondent
Thressiamma, W/o. Varkey
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court