Anitha v. Annamma Jacob
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals arisen from decrees in partition suits were allowed as the matter had been mediated and settled by the parties with a compromise which becomes part of the appellate decree.
What did the court decide?
Compromise recorded; appeals allowed accordingly; compromise forms part of appellate decree.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 24TH ASHADHA, 1941
RSA.No.1305 of 2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 206/2008 OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DATED 31-10-2009
AGAINST JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 1115/1995 OF THE II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DATED 22-07-2002
APPELLANT/RESPONDENTS IN A.S./PLAINTIFFS IN O.S.:
- 1 ANITHA, D/O SARADA, GOWRIVILASATHU VEEDU, PANGUDU MURI, SASTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- 2 AJITHA, D/O. SARADA, DO.... DO....
BY ADV. SMT.R.RANJINI
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anitha
- appellant
Ajitha
- respondent
Annamma Jacob
- respondent
Mariamma Jacob
- respondent
Rachal Jacob
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court