Basheerkhan v. Subadra
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed by the High Court on the ground of non-prosecution, as the court received no positive response despite notice and ordered steps failing to be taken.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1941
RSA.No.106 of 2008
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19-09-2007 IN AS 49/2004 of THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12-11-2003 IN OS 157/2002 of THE MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 2/DEFENDANTS NO.1 & 2:
1 BASHEERKHAN, S/O ABDULKHADER KHAN, MELEEZHUTHANI, VANDITHAVALAM VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DIST.
2 ALIMON, S/O.KUNJUMOHAMMED SELMA MANZIL, VALAKKODE VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, REP. BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY, HOLDER P.K.BEEVIJAN, W/O.NAZAR, ALAYAR, VANDITHAVALAM VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DIST.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed by the appellants comes to be dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
BASHEERKHAN
- appellant
ALIMON
- respondent
SUBADRA
- respondent
SUJISHA
- respondent
SUDEESH
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court