The High Court of Kerala disposed of a Revision Petition concerning a Family Court order. Counsel reported the matter was settled via an agreement dated 15.10.2011. The court superseded the impugned order with the agreement terms.
The impugned order is superseded by the terms of the agreement dated 15.10.2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1941
RPFC.No.21 OF 2011
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC 427/2010 OF FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM
REVISION PETITIONER/S:
SUNEER CHIERIPPARAMBAN
CHERIPPARAMBAN HOUSE, THARISSU P.O.,, KARUVARAKKUNDU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,, KARUVARAKKUNDU PSL.
BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1 RUBEENA, PALAPRA HOUSE, CHAPPANANGADI P.O.,, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 523.
2 RISHA FAMIDA AGED 5 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN - MOTHER 1ST, RESPONDENT RUBEENA PALAPRA.
R1 BY ADV. SMT.T.J.MARIA GORETTI R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.VENUGOPAL 108692
THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
::2::
RPFC.No.21 OF 2011
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J .
R.P(FC).No.21 Of 2011
Dated this the 13th day of November, 2019.
O R D E R
The prayer in the above Revision Petition (FC) reads as follows:
“................. to set aside the Order in M.C.427/2010 on the file of the Family Court, Malappuram dated 29.11.2010, and allow the Revision Petition with cost.”
memo dated 4.11.2019. It is stated therein that the matter has been settled between the parties as per the compromise entered and this Court may dispose of the above Revision Petition in terms of the agreement entered into between the petitioner and the 1st respondent, etc.
::3::
RPFC.No.21 OF 2011
15.10.2011 (which is appended to the abovesaid memo) shall be placed as an annexure to the order in this Revision Petition for the purpose of clarity.
With these observations and directions, the above Revision Petition (FC) will stand finally disposed of.
Sd/ALEXANDER THOMAS, Judge.
bkn/-
::4::
RPFC.No.21 OF 2011
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE: COPY OF AGREEMENT DATED 15.10.2011 ENTERED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
::5::
RPFC.No.21 OF 2011
::6::
RPFC.No.21 OF 2011
::7::
RPFC.No.21 OF 2011
::8::
RPFC.No.21 OF 2011
Suneer Chieripparamban
Rubeena
Risha Famida
Alexander Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
